I can’t believe this class is almost over. It seems like
just yesterday (so cliché—I know), I was jumping for joy that I got into this
class amid the craziness of registration. I came into this class thinking that
I would be watching a bunch of Disney movies and analyzing them in
high-school-literature-class-fashion. I got half of that right. We did watch a
lot of Disney movies for sure—a lot of which I kind of knew the stories of but
had never actually watched before—but the analysis was so much more in depth
and more relevant than I expected.
This class was basically a modern women’s studies class. I
learned so much about gender and gender-portrayal in Disney princess films that
I feel like I’ve emerged from this class a higher level of feminist and Disney critic
than I was when I came in. Before this class, I liked Disney because I thought
its songs were fantastic (I still shamelessly sing them at the top of my lungs)
and the stories were cute, but now I’m suspicious of the fact that almost every
movie weaves romance into its plotline—independent young women don’t need no
man! Or princesses for that matter.
Through this class, I’ve learned about Disney’s history and
the evolution of its princesses. I became more aware of how Disney is affected
by and actively incorporates current events into the production of its films. I
distinctly remember the article I used for my second essay. I feel like that
article taught me the most about Disney’s history because of its analysis of
when Disney produced, or rather did not produce, princess films. The article taught
me that the films’ purpose was to perpetuate traditional gender roles or
whatever is socially acceptable. In the 1900s, princesses such as Snow White
(1937), Cinderella (1950), and Aurora (1959) perpetuated traditional domestic female
roles because they were produced in eras when women were encouraged to stay at
home. However, the fact that there were no Disney princess films in the 1940s,
when women were empowered, points to the fact that Disney’s major role is to
perpetuate old standards. Reading this article and other analyses in class made
me more skeptical of Disney’s intentions.
I also became more aware of gender and cultural/racial
disparities present in Disney films. Through rewatching Disney princess movies
with a concentration on gender, I noticed sexist comments and actions that I
had never noticed before, such as the scene in Cinderella when the king insists that there must be a good mother out
of the many women at the ball. This might explain why I felt inexplicably uneasy
during parts of princess movies—because my inner feminist was uncomfortable
with the traditional gender roles represented in the old and some newer movies—e.g.
when Ariel and Pocahontas say “daddy I love him!” When I was reading articles
for my third essay, I came across lots of background racism, like the
realization that even though Disney claimed to create a diverse film by changing
the physical race of the characters, it still injected American values into the
culture, thereby devaluing its diversity.
However, no matter how egregious Disney’s mistakes are, it
is still good that we are learning about them because now we can educate others
about gender and racial disparities in popular media, or at least see the world
with different eyes. Then we can help effect change in society, and maybe
Disney will change again. As for me, I know for sure when I get around to
seeing Moana, I will be viewing it
from a different perspective—albeit a more critical one—and I hope with every
new princess film, Disney improves its representation of women and different
cultures.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment